Chasing a moving target.
Moderators: FourthWorld, heatherlaine, Klaus, kevinmiller, robinmiller
-
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Bulgaria
Chasing a moving target.
https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/13621/xcode
This is what it is, and the big question is, is it worth the effort?
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
Apple has been delivering IDEs for their OSes since at least 1986 when they premiered Macintosh Programmer's Workshop. Never used MPW myself (along with many other devs I preferred Think Pascal and later Think C, both from Symantec). But some people really like Apple's tooling.richmond62 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:29 pmSShot 2022-06-03 at 22.28.24.png
-
https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/13621/xcode
This is what it is, and the big question is, is it worth the effort?
Seems a matter of personal taste. If you like it, it's worth it. If not, the world has no shortage of great tools. You could even use LiveCode.
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
-
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: Chasing a moving target.
I do, from time to time . . .You could even use LiveCode.
BUT, to knock out an iOS standalone one needs to 'keep getting sweaty' . . .
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
The web is where it's at. It's like the HyperCard we used to enjoy, when no one needed standalones because everyone already had the engine preinstalled. Browsers are preinstalled on every GUI device made, no matter the OS, no matter the size. They take care of the packaging and the OS-vendor-hoop-jumping, and we get to share nothing more than a simple URL to distribute apps.richmond62 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:50 pmI do, from time to time . . .You could even use LiveCode.
BUT, to knock out an iOS standalone one needs to 'keep getting sweaty' . . .
And on the web, you don't have the shakedown from an OS vendor demanding a chunk of your business revenue ("Nice windows you got here. It'd be a shame if anything were to happen to them.").
Free. Open. Decentralized.
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
-
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: Chasing a moving target.
Try telling Bulgarian teenagers who want to develop side-scrollers for their iOS and Android phones.The web is where it's at.
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
https://www.crazygames.com/t/side-scrollingrichmond62 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:15 pmTry telling Bulgarian teenagers who want to develop side-scrollers for their iOS and Android phones.The web is where it's at.
Add a manifest file to the root level of a site and you can have a separate browser instance with no URL bar, native look, native feel, installs as easily as adding an icon to your home screen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressi ... pplication
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
-
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: Chasing a moving target.
Try telling Bulgarian teenagers attending my LiveCode classes who
want to develop side-scrolling games for their phones.
want to develop side-scrolling games for their phones.
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
LC doesn't deploy to the web?richmond62 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:40 pmTry telling Bulgarian teenagers attending my LiveCode classes who
want to develop side-scrolling games for their phones.
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
Re: Chasing a moving target.
I guess for me the biggest obstacle to considering “the web” as a deployment platform is that i don’t actually use web apps in my daily life. Every single app and game I use is an actual app.
Ok yes, for some things I use web and I guess they could be construed as “apps” but none of these work offline or follow the standard interface guidelines I’m accustomed to as a user. Plus usual transactional behaviour can fail completely with refreshing the page (or closing it).
Based mainly on my own experiences as a user rather than a developer, HTML5 apps just don’t feel tangible enough to replace “normal” apps.
I understand all the arguments for pushing web apps, but I’m probably not alone in feeling this… on the desktop this is even more pronounced as you don’t have to use the AppStores and don’t have to have a bite taken out of your profits (although you then have to organise your own hosting, bandwidth, accepting a loss in visibility).
Keeping an open mind on the matter, but I for one can’t see the web is “where it’s at” right now… at least not until big hitters like Apple and Microsoft get on the same train and push tooling and infrastructure forward…
Ok yes, for some things I use web and I guess they could be construed as “apps” but none of these work offline or follow the standard interface guidelines I’m accustomed to as a user. Plus usual transactional behaviour can fail completely with refreshing the page (or closing it).
Based mainly on my own experiences as a user rather than a developer, HTML5 apps just don’t feel tangible enough to replace “normal” apps.
I understand all the arguments for pushing web apps, but I’m probably not alone in feeling this… on the desktop this is even more pronounced as you don’t have to use the AppStores and don’t have to have a bite taken out of your profits (although you then have to organise your own hosting, bandwidth, accepting a loss in visibility).
Keeping an open mind on the matter, but I for one can’t see the web is “where it’s at” right now… at least not until big hitters like Apple and Microsoft get on the same train and push tooling and infrastructure forward…
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9852
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
Stam, what do you use for maps on your laptop?
We live in a funny world: On the desktop, everyone says "It must be on the web!". Then on their phones they say, "It must be a native app!".
I don't need to understand it. As a developer my job is to merely hear it and deal with it.
Most of the world deals with it by packaging web apps inside of native bundles (as in React Native).
Personally, I drop apps on my phone where the vendor provides a web version. Facebook, for example, is not merely more trustable run through Firefox, it's a much better, more flexible experience.
Most folks making apps also need web versions. With modern tooling, they're increasingly the same thing.
We live in a funny world: On the desktop, everyone says "It must be on the web!". Then on their phones they say, "It must be a native app!".
I don't need to understand it. As a developer my job is to merely hear it and deal with it.
Most of the world deals with it by packaging web apps inside of native bundles (as in React Native).
Personally, I drop apps on my phone where the vendor provides a web version. Facebook, for example, is not merely more trustable run through Firefox, it's a much better, more flexible experience.
Most folks making apps also need web versions. With modern tooling, they're increasingly the same thing.
Richard Gaskin
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
LiveCode development, training, and consulting services: Fourth World Systems
LiveCode Group on Facebook
LiveCode Group on LinkedIn
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:31 pm
- Location: Minneapolis MN
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
The Google ecosystem is largely web apps, and if you're a Chromebook user it's even more pronounced. If LC wants to move into the education space, where Chromebooks are very popular, then web apps are almost a necessity.
I prefer native apps myself, but now that I use my Chromebook more often than not, I realize the need for web apps. My Android apps do run on Chromebook but not nearly as smoothly.
I prefer native apps myself, but now that I use my Chromebook more often than not, I realize the need for web apps. My Android apps do run on Chromebook but not nearly as smoothly.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw dot com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
-
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: Chasing a moving target.
Very droll.the education space
There is NO unified 'space', education CAN and SHOULD be everywhere; all-pervasive and unavoidable.
Re: Chasing a moving target.
You are unquestionably correct that on chromebook webapps are a must...
But that's only because the chromebook ecosystem is geared towards this and doesn't generalise well to other ecosystems...
For me this proves it's possible but requires the appropriate backing from the OS - which for mac/win doesn't really exist, hence my point above.
Apps don't exist in a vacuum..
-
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 7257
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:31 pm
- Location: Minneapolis MN
- Contact:
Re: Chasing a moving target.
That may be an Americanism. Substitute "market" if you like.richmond62 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 05, 2022 7:45 pmThere is NO unified 'space', education CAN and SHOULD be everywhere; all-pervasive and unavoidable.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw dot com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com