ChatGPT and LiveCode

[SparkOut]

I didn't pass immediate judgement but reserve the legitimate right to retain some scepticism.
As mentioned, "while it might be legitimate" ... I have some doubts.

"Mostly" it's valid syntax. I haven't attempted to run it, but while it might be legitimate, a "return" from a "command" (not a function) rings like a bell made from reconstituted pork products.

You have decided that a poster must be a spammer because the code produced by AI has errors in it?

no, not at all. I have some doubts. I said as much and truly hope this is a legitimate poster.
Maybe hold onto your immediate judgement of immediate judgement and perhaps accept that even if it turns out one way or another there are legitimate viewpoints which may amicably be at variance.




.

[stam]

Ah SparkOut you make me smile

[trevix]

Let's AI decide if it is a spam or not

[richmond62]

My recent experience with A.I. did not make me think of "reconstituted pork products", it made me think rather more of pot-au-feu, especially the way certain "sausages" kept coming round again and again, and the way that the robot forgot I didn't like "mushrooms" (over use of quotation marks), yet kept putting them in the marmite.

It seems reasonably easy to distinguish A.I. from Spam: erm, until someone tells a robot to write spam.